February 2009 - In this elaborate and
in-depth article, UK based researcher
lecturer and author David Icke exposes the
ties that bind Obama to the Babylonian elite
just like all US presidents.
Obama: The Naked Emperor
CIRCULATE AS WIDELY AS POSSIBLE. THE LINK TO
SEND PEOPLE IS:
I am writing this in the
last days of 2008 as I watch with dismay as
vast numbers of people across the world,
including many who should know better, have
been duped by the mind-game called Operation
Even people with some
understanding of the conspiracy have said
things like: 'Well, at least he's not Bush'
and 'Well, at least it's great to see such a
new spirit of hope'. No, he's not Bush -
he's potentially far more dangerous;
and what is the use of a spirit of 'hope' if
it's based on a lie? In fact, what use is
'hope' at all?
Obama's wife, Michelle,
who I wouldn't trust to tell me the date in
a calendar factory, said that 'everything
begins and ends with hope'. Utter nonsense.
Hope is a meaningless emotion because its
fruits are always in the future and, by
definition, never in the NOW.
Hope is like riding a
carousel horse; no matter how fast you go
you never get closer to the one in front.
The idea, however, is to persuade you to
stay on the horse, despite the evitable
disappointment, in the 'hope' that things
will change. But they don't because the very
system is designed to prevent it.
That's the way 'hope' is
employed by the dastardly and devious - take
the crap we are giving you now in the
'hope' that things will get better (but we
know they won't). Barack Obama is a purveyor
of 'hope' because his masters want the
people to accept what they are given now in
the hope that good times will come.
Just do what we demand,
oops, sorry, Barack demands, and in
return he'll inspire you to hope that
it is all leading to the Promised Land. It
isn't, but, by the time you realise that,
it's too late.
What terrifies the
manipulators is that people will abandon
hope, as a future, sometime-never
projection, and start to demand fairness,
justice and freedom now. To avoid
this nightmare they need to keep those
desires as something to aspire to, not to
Thus, their man, Obama,
sells 'hope' as a diversion technique, a
holding position, to keep the masses from
truly rebelling. We have no job, no food on
the table and our home has been foreclosed,
but at least we have 'hope'. Phew, thank
goodness for that.
'I'm hungry, mum, can I
have some hope, please?'
'I'm so sorry,
darling, you can't have hope today, only
tomorrow - hope is always tomorrow.'
'So will I eat
'We can hope so now,
dear, but when we get to tomorrow, we can
only hope it's the next day.'
On and on it goes. That's
how 'hope' works. Or rather doesn't.
Obama's predominant mantra
has been 'change'. Indeed, his
massively-funded, record-breaking campaign
was based on that one word - change.
This is a technique used by Bill Clinton and
many others and it is highly effective
because, at any point, the system ensures
that most people are not happy with the way
life is. So, when you don't like the status
quo, 'change' can be a potent message, even
if, like Obama, you don't say what it means.
It has been vital to his
success, and that of his controllers, that
he has never specified what his 'hope',
'change', and that other mind-control
trigger-word, 'believe', were referring to
in terms of policy and the way society in
general will be affected. Hope for what?
Change what? Believe in what?
To answer those questions with specifics
would have been fatal to Obama's appeal.
I studied the
military/government mind-control programmes
and techniques in great detail for many
years during the late-1990s and across 2000,
and the Obama 'phenomenon' is the most
blatant mass-mind control operation you
could wish to see.
At its core the plan has
been to make Obama the focus of everything
you hope for, believe in and want to change.
This is why it has been crucial for him not
to specify and detail what is meant by his
'hope, 'change' and 'believe'.
However, I can tell you
what those words mean in the context of the
Obama mind-game. They mean whatever you decide
they mean or want them to mean. The
idea is for you to project all that you
stand for onto him and so he becomes the
symbol of you and how you see the world.
Specifics would destroy that 'I am whatever
you want me to be' scenario and so you don't
get any detail, just 'hope', 'change', and
They don't want him to be
seen only as 'the Messiah'; they also want
him to be Abraham Lincoln, JFK, or Buddha -
anyone you choose to project on him, for he
is a blank page, blank screen and empty
suit. Obama is a make-your-own,
do-it-yourself leader, a projection of your
own mind. (If you are still asleep, that is.
If you are in any way awake, he's an open
See the video How Obama
Got Elected to see how easy it is to
manipulate the masses. It's child's play. Click
whatever you want me to be, for I am just a
projection of you. And I got a big smile,
There is no more powerful
way of manipulating people than to tell them
what they want to hear and to keep shtum
about anything they wouldn't like.
Double-glazing salesmen are trained to pick
up in general conversation what their target
likes and dislikes and to respond
accordingly in the way the product is sold.
The technique is simply to tell the
potential buyer what you have gleaned they
want to be told.
Obama comes from the same
stable, but on a massively bigger scale and
with a whole network of advisors and
controllers steeped in the art of
manipulating minds, opinions and actions.
speeches are not from the heart, but from
the autocue. The 'heart' bit comes from
extensive training and his Bill Clintonesque
ability to 'mean it when he says it', a
state of delivery that goes beyond mere
acting. Tony Blair was trained in the same
But if you take a step
back and look at these people
dispassionately you can clearly see the
techniques they consciously employ. Blair is
the most blatant fraud in the way he
delivers a line, stops in mid-sentence for
emphasis and looks down for fake emotional
effect. Obama is a little more slick, but,
from where I have been looking this past
year, not much. And how have people not seen
those cold eyes just above the painted
You can watch his mind
working, turning between autocue screens to
his left and right, then straight down the
camera for his key messages. From-the-heart
orators don't do that; they are too immersed
in what they are feeling and saying to give
even a passing thought to where they are
looking or how the line is delivered.
I worked in television for
more than a decade, often reading autocue
while a director spoke in my ear telling me
what cameras to look at. I have, since the
early 1990s, spoken my truth on public
stages across the world. I know, therefore,
the difference between artificial autocue
delivery and body language and talking from
the heart without a script. Obama, I repeat,
is coming from the autocue, not the heart.
Obama's speeches are a
mass of mind-control techniques and Neuro-Linguistic-Programming,
or NLP, and they are carefully constructed
to implant beliefs and perceptions into the
mind of the viewer. Click here for a
description of his psycho-babble, headed An
Examination of Obama's Use of Hidden
Hypnosis Techniques in His Speeches.
As I keep emphasising, the
whole Obama circus is an exercise in mass
mind control and it has been so successful
because so many people live their lives in a
permanent state of trance. All of which
brings me to the parallels with Nazi
Germany, fascist Italy and similar regimes
Obama may not look like
Hitler, nor sound like Hitler, but the
themes are just the same. Germany was in a
terrible state economically and militarily
in the 1930s in the aftermath of the First
World War and the reparations inflicted on
the country by the
'Peace' Conference in 1919.
From amid the chaos came
the man that Germans saw then in much the
same way that so many see Obama today. His
name was Adolf Hitler and his oratory and
rhetoric, again supported by a ritualistic
presentation founded on mind-control
techniques, made him appear to be the German
'messiah', the German Obama.
Hitler promised 'change',
'hope' and something to 'believe in' amidst
the consequences of war and financial
collapse. He spoke to vast rallies of
adoring followers and a mass movement
emerged in support of Hitler's vision of a
As the writer Webster
Tarpley points out, fascism in its true
sense is not just a Police State imposed by
a tiny hierarchy. It might end up like that,
but first it is brought to power by a mass
movement from within the people who have no
understanding of what the 'change', hope'
and 'believe' they are being offered really
means. They just know that they want some
because, as with Obama, they make it mean
what they want it to mean. Only later do
they see, to their horror, what they have
signed up for.
may seem to be a world of difference, but
the techniques are just the same.
Obama is far more
dangerous than Bush because he can sell a
line to those who are in the trance while
Boy Bush could not do that on anything like
the same scale. Bush was a transparent idiot
with no communication skills who needed
massive fraud at the polls to get him
officially 'elected'. He could never be the
figurehead to inspire a mass movement of the
people to support some vacuous 'hope',
'change' and 'believe' when they don't even
know what those words are supposed to mean.
But Obama clearly can,
because he has.
One of 'his' (his
controllers') prime targets are the young,
just as they were with the Nazis and the
Hitler Youth Movement. If you think this
parallel is far-fetched then have a look at
this video to see how extreme Obama worship
has already become for some young people.
Hitler Youth was just the same. Click
here to watch ...
In line with this theme,
the WorldNetDaily website reported:
'The official website
of President-Elect Barack Obama, Change.gov,
originally announced that Obama would
"require" all middle school
through college students to participate in
community service programs; but after a
flurry of blogs protested children being
drafted into Obama's proposed youth corps,
the website's wording was softened.
Originally, under the
tab "America Serves", Change.gov
read, "President-Elect Obama will
expand national service programs like
AmeriCorps and Peace Corps and will create a
new Classroom Corps to help teachers in
under served schools, as well as a new
Health Corps, Clean Energy Corps, and
"Obama will call
on citizens of all ages to serve America, by
developing a plan to require 50 hours of
community service in middle school and high
school and 100 hours of community service in
college every year," the site
For the full story, click
Obama said in a speech in
July 2008 in Colorado Springs that he wanted
to see a 'civilian national security force'
that would be as powerful and well-funded as
the Marines, Navy and Air Force. As Joseph
Farah, founder of WorldNetDaily,
'If we're going to
create some kind of national police force as
big, powerful and well funded as our
combined U.S. military forces, isn't this
rather a big deal? I thought Democrats
generally believed the U.S. spent too much
on the military.
How is it possible
their candidate is seeking to create some
kind of massive but secret national police
force that will be even bigger than the
Army, Navy, Marines and Air Force put
together? Is Obama serious about creating
some kind of domestic security force bigger
and more expensive than that? If not, why
did he say it? What did he mean?'
Obama meant, amid the
flowery words, that he's not in favour of
either peace or freedom. He is a front-man
demagogue for the same force that controlled
Boy Bush, Clinton, Father Bush, Reagan,
Carter, ad infinitum; but the difference is
that he has been hyped to such hysterical
proportions that he will be allowed to get
away with far more than they were, at least
until reality dawns on the mass ranks of his
hypnotised supporters. And, clearly, that
could take some time.
The cabal will be anxious
to squeeze every minute from Obama's
honeymoon period and we can expect to see
events move quickly after his inauguration
When I was a journalist 30
years ago, I came across a technique that
some tabloid newspaper reporters would use
to get someone to speak with them. They
would work in pairs with the first one
knocking on the door of some distressed
family who didn't want to talk with the
media. He would tell them he was from a
newspaper he didn't really work for and
treat them with aggression and contempt to
make them even more upset.
He would then leave and
his colleague would knock on the door, tell
them the real newspaper he was from, and act
like Mr. Nice Guy. He would say that he
understood completely how upsetting the
other man must have been, but 'if you will
only speak to me exclusively I will make
sure that the other man, nor anyone like
him, won't bother you again'. They usually
agreed and the scam was complete.
Much the same thing is
happening with regard to Bush and Obama. The
Neoconservative 'Republican' wing of the
Illuminati controlled Bush for eight years
and led the country into foreign wars and
financial chaos (bad guy/problem); now the
'Democratic' wing, led by the infamous
Zbigniew Brzezinski, has brought forth the 'saviour',
Barack Obama, to lead us into the sunshine
with 'hope' and 'change' (good
Hence even some more aware
people say: 'At least he's not Bush'.
Apart from the unspecified
'hope, 'change' and 'believe', few have any
idea what Obama's policies will be. Public
perception comes from having an 'image' of
him, or a self-projection, not the fine
print because Obama doesn't do fine print
until the votes are cast and even then he
will hide it in his windbag words.
There is an 'image' that
Obama is against war, but no he's not.
He says he's against the invasion of Iraq,
though we'll see what he does about that in
office. How can a man calling for more
troops, including European troops, to be
sent to Afghanistan be against war? He has
also said he is prepared to bomb Pakistan
and use military force to stop Iran building
nuclear weapons and he has appointed Hillary
'Let's bomb 'em' Clinton (Bilderberg Group,
Trilateral Commission, Council on Foreign
Relations) as Secretary of State and
re-appointed Bush's 'Let's bomb 'em'
Secretary of Defense, Robert Gates (Bilderberg
Group, Council on Foreign Relations). So
that's the 'change we can believe in', then.
Obama isn't against war at
all and, if his controllers have their way,
he will engage the US in even more foreign
conflicts with the troops sent to their
deaths, and the deaths of their targets, on
a wave of oratory from the dark suit with
the black face who would never go where he's
He claims to be a 'uniter',
which is exactly what Bush said about
himself before he came to office, but unity
in and of itself is not the issue. Nazi
Germany had unity in the early years of the
war, but was that a good thing? What matters
is what the unity is designed to achieve and
Obama's much-vaunted 'unity' is to 'inspire'
a mass movement to support the Orwellian
plans of the Illuminati.
His constant rhetoric
about 'bringing people together' can be used
to justify the 'coming together' of the
United States, Canada and Mexico in the
North American Union; it can be used to
concede America's sovereignty to the 'coming
together' of the 'world community' (world
dictatorship); it can be used to unite the
believers in their opposition and
condemnation of non-believers, which is
precisely what happened in Nazi Germany with
the book-burning and violent suppression of
those who challenged the Hitler regime.
The potential of Obama
Mania is endless when it comes to selling
fascism as 'hope, change', 'freedom' and a
'New America', or 'New World' [Order].
Bush and Cheney were
transparent warmongers and would always have
struggled to bring in the draft, the
compulsory enlistment of people into the
military against their will. But it would
not be as difficult for Obama in the current
climate. For goodness sake, he's already
talking about compulsory community service
for middle school, high school and college
students and creating a peoples' army in
That's why I say Obama is
far more dangerous to freedom than Bush. In
the last eight years Bush could only get
part of the way to fascism - Obama has the
potential to finish the job, for all the
reasons I have mentioned and more.
You only have to look at
the cabal behind Obama, and those he has
already appointed to his administration
team, to see what his 'change' is truly
planned to be. His mentor, svengali and main
controller is Zbigniew Brzezinski, Jimmy
Carter's National Security Advisor, and the
co-founder, with David Rockefeller, of the
Illuminati's Trilateral Commission.
Brzezinski has admitted
publicly that he began to fund and train
what he would call today 'terrorists' in
Afghanistan to oppose the Soviet-controlled
government in the capital, Kabul, in the
late 1970s. The idea, he said, was to entice
the Soviet Union to invade Afghanistan to
protect the Kabul regime and thus give the
rival superpower 'their Vietnam'. The plan
worked at the cost of a million Afghan lives
during the Soviet occupation from 1979 to
1989, a consequence that troubles Brzezinski
not at all.
fighters' would become known as the 'Mujahideen'
and later the Taliban and what is claimed to
be 'Al-Qaeda'. This is the man behind
'anti-war', Barack Obama. It was common
knowledge that President Carter would do
nothing involving foreign policy without the
okay from Brzezinski, the co-founder of the
Trilateral Commission which chose Carter
It is one of many great
ironies of the Obama presidency that he is
demanding massive troop reinforcements to be
sent to Afghanistan to fight the Taliban
terrorists who were initially armed, trained
and organised by Brzezinski, the man behind
Obama. As Morpheus says in The Matrix:
'Fate, it seems, is not without its sense of
But then, in Brzezinski's
case, it is not 'fate', but cold calculation
that has brought it all about. The
Poland-born Brzezinski has a fierce hatred
of Russia and that is still one of his key
targets, together with China.
And if they are
Brzezinski's targets, they are Obama's
The Trilateral Commission
and the wider Brzezinski network, including
Illuminati fronts like the Ford Foundation,
have now chosen Obama and the situation will
be the same. Brzezinski will call the shots;
Obama's job is simply to sell them to the
people. This is rather alarming when you
think that Brzezinski wants to trigger a war
involving Russia and China. 'Obama's'
policies come straight from Brzezinski's
books. Here is one Brzezinski quote you
might recognise and it was made before Obama
ran for president:
reassessment ... can be encouraged by
deliberate civic education that stresses the
notion of service to a higher cause than
oneself. As some have occasionally urged, a
major step in that direction would be the
adoption of an obligatory period of national
service for every young adult, perhaps
involving a variety of congressionally
approved domestic or foreign good works.'
Now where have I heard
As an Illuminati
operative, Brzezinski's aim is to create a
world government, central bank, currency and
army - a global dictatorship - underpinned
by a microchipped population connected to a
global computer/satellite system. He wrote a
book in 1970, Between Two Ages: America's
Role in the Technetronic Era, in which
he described the global society that he and
the Illuminati seek to impose:
'The technetronic era
involves the gradual appearance of a more
controlled society. Such a society would be
dominated by an elite, unrestrained by
traditional values. Soon it will be possible
to assert almost continuous surveillance
over every citizen and maintain up-to-date
complete files containing even the most
personal information about the citizen.
These files will be subject to instantaneous
retrieval by the authorities.'
He also said in the same
book nearly 40 years ago:
'Today we are again
witnessing the emergence of transnational
elites ... [Whose] ties cut across national
boundaries ... It is likely that before long
the social elites of most of the more
advanced countries will be highly
internationalist or globalist in spirit and
outlook ... The nation-state is gradually
yielding its sovereignty ... Further
progress will require greater American
sacrifices. More intensive efforts to shape
a new world monetary structure will have to
be undertaken, with some consequent risk to
the present relatively favorable American
And what does his puppet,
Obama, now say that Americans have to do to
bring about 'change'? 'Make sacrifices'.
As Mrs. Demagogue, Michelle, said:
'We need a different
leadership because our souls are broken. We
need to be inspired ... to make the
sacrifices that are needed to push us to a
You can bet that this will
include sacrificing more sovereignty and
freedom on the road to the global
dictatorship described by Brzezinski for
Brzezinski's son, Mark,
was an 'advisor' to the Obama campaign
(doing what his father told him) and, in
line with the American one-party-state, his
other son, Ian, was foreign policy advisor
to the McCain campaign (doing what his
father told him). His daughter, the
Obama-supporting Mika Brzezinski, reported
the campaign for MSNBC television.
Obama has been the chosen
one for a long time, a fact known only to a
few in the deep inner circle, and his
relationship with Brzezinski almost
certainly goes back to the start of the
1980s when he attended the Ivy League, and
big-time Illuminati, Columbia University
where Brzezinski was head of the Institute
for Communist Affairs. Obama simply will not
talk in any detail about this period. He has
been covertly funded and supported ever
since by the Trilateral Commission and its
network of foundations connecting into the
Ford Foundation, for whom Obama's mother
And a question: Does
anyone really believe that someone, a 'man
of the people', would simply appear from
apparently nowhere to run the slickest and
best-funded presidential campaign in
American history? He was chosen long ago by
those who wish to enslave the very people
that Obama says he wants to 'set free'.
The sources of Obama
funding read like a Wall Street Who's Who -
Goldman Sachs, UBS, Citigroup, Credit
Suisse, Deutsche Bank, J.P. Morgan Chase,
Morgan Stanley, and so on. No wonder he went
back on his pledge to accept the limitations
of public funding for his campaign and
instead took the no-limit option of
And those people are going
to support a candidate who does not
represent their best interests?? Oh please.
Obama and his seasoned
network of professional manipulators, sorry
his 'campaign team', sold the lie that he
had refused to take funding from
'lobbyists', those who are paid to ensure
that politicians frame legislation, or block
it, in the interests of their clients.
But like everything that
surrounds Obama, past and present, it's a
sleight of hand and mouth. They funnelled
vast sums of money into the Obama accounts
through law firms that represent
lobbyists and lobby groups. It provided
'plausible denial' about funding from
lobbyists while the money poured in from
lobby interests via third parties.
Then there is the Jewish
financier, George Soros, the
multi-billionaire associate of Brzezinski
and closely involved with the funding and
marketing of Obama. Soros is a former board
member of the Illuminati's Council on
Foreign Relations and funds the European
Council on Foreign Relations. In short, he
is a major insider.
You can certainly see the
Soros/Brzezinski techniques in the Obama
'revolution' in the United States. It was
the complex and secretive network of Soros
foundations and organisations, connected to
the intelligence agencies of the US and
Israel, that trained and funded students in
the Ukraine, Georgia and elsewhere in the
art of mass protest and overthrowing
protests were sold to the world as 'peoples'
revolutions', but it just so happened that
when they were over and the old regime was
removed the new leaders were those waiting
in the wings all along - the puppets of
Soros, Brzezinski and their associated
Obama is just more of the
same, a big smile with strings attached, and
controlled completely by the Illuminati
networks that chose him, trained him, sold
him and provided his record funding. It was
they who kept his many skeletons under
wraps, like the gay sex and crack
cocaine allegations of Larry
Sinclair, and they will continue to
do so as long as he jumps to their bidding.
Obama is just another
Banksters' moll prostituting himself for
fame and power, and that's why he supported
the grotesque bail-out of the banking system
and why he will always put their interests
before the people. His financial advisors
are straight from the Wall Street 'A' list,
including Paul Adolph Volker (Trilateral
Commission, Council on Foreign Relations,
Bilderberg Group), the head of the Federal
Reserve from 1979 to 1987 and Illuminati to
Obama has made him head of
the Economic Recovery Advisory Board, which
is dominated by insiders, including its
staff director and chief economist, Austan
Goolsbee, a close Obama associate from the
University of Chicago. Goolsbee is an
initiate of the infamous Illuminati Skull
and Bones Society at Yale University, which
also includes Boy and Father Bush. It
was Goolsbee who told the Canadian
government not to worry about Obama's
attacks on the economic effects of 'free
trade' agreements because his words were
just to win votes in the election campaign.
Another Wall Street
insider, the Zionist Timothy Geithner (Bilderberg
Group, Trilateral Commission, Council on
Foreign Relations), was appointed by Obama
to be his Treasury Secretary. Geithner was
the President of the New York Federal
Reserve Bank, the most powerful in the
private 'Federal' Reserve cartel that
masquerades as America's 'central bank', and
he is a former employee of both the Council
on Foreign Relations and the appalling
Obama's Treasury team
locks into the inner circle around the
Zionist Robert Rubin, the Director and
Senior Counselor of Citigroup, co-chairman
of the Council on Foreign Relations, and
economic advisor to Obama. Rubin, a member
of the Illuminati Bilderberg Group, was the
man behind Citigroup's strategy of expanding
its risk in debt markets which forced it to
be rescued by taxpayers' money.
The very people who caused
the financial crisis are being appointed by
Obama to decide how to respond to it (more
taxpayers' money for them and their
Rubin was Treasury
Secretary to Bill Clinton and was followed
in that post by Larry Summers (Bilderberg
Group, Trilateral Commission, Council on
Foreign Relations) - another insider
appointed to Obama's team of 'change'.
Summers is a fanatical supporter of 'free
trade' (freedom to exploit) and 'globalisation'
(global dictatorship) and he wrote a memo in
1991, while chief economist to the World
Bank, saying that the bank should dump toxic
waste in poor countries because the costs of
the ensuing ill-health and death would be
lower. When the memo was made public,
Brazil's then-Secretary of the Environment,
Jose Lutzenburger, told Summers:
'Your reasoning is
perfectly logical but totally insane ...
Your thoughts [provide] a concrete
example of the unbelievable alienation,
reductionist thinking, social ruthlessness
and the arrogant ignorance of many
conventional 'economists' concerning the
nature of the world we live in ... If the
World Bank keeps you as vice president it
will lose all credibility. To me it would
confirm what I often said ...the best thing
that could happen would be for the Bank to
Lutzenburger was dismissed
shortly after writing this letter while the
horrific Summers was made US Treasury
Secretary by Bill Clinton and now he has
been appointed to head the National Economic
Council by Mr. 'change', hope' and 'believe'
Obama. It's all a fairy story.
that the Center for American Progress (CAP),
housed just three blocks from the White
House, has become a major source for policy
initiatives for the Obama Democratic Party.
Who funds the Center for American Progress? George
It is simply the Neocon
Project for the New American Century and the
American Enterprise Institute under another
name. Those two organisations developed and
dictated the Bush policy of war and
suppression of freedom and the 'CAP' and
others like it will do the same for Obama.
The CAP will fit and Obama will wear it.
In fact, except in name
and rhetoric, there is no difference in
theme between the regimes of Bush and Obama.
Bush policy was dictated through Illuminati
'think tanks' and so is Obama's.
Bush was surrounded by
slavish pursuers of Israeli interests and so
is Obama. Mr. 'Change' has pledged his
unquestioning support for Israel to the
point of 'pass the sick bag' and his
vice-president, Joe Biden (Bilderberg Group,
Council on Foreign Relations), is a vehement
Zionist who makes a virtue of saying he will
support Israel in all circumstances.
Obama has appointed the
arch Zionist Rahm Emanuel as his chief of
staff and another super Zionist Jew, Dennis
Ross, to be his Middle East Policy advisor.
God help the Palestinians. Ross also served
in the Bill Clinton and Father George Bush
administrations. Oh, plenty of 'change'
Rahm Emanuel, a
Chicago-born Congressman, is the son of
Benjamin M. Emanuel, who was a member of the
murderous Jewish terrorist organisation,
Irgun, which helped to bomb and terrorise
Israel into existence. The Open Secrets
website reports that Emanuel was the top
House recipient in 2008 for election
contributions from 'hedge funds, private
equity firms and the larger
Emanuel was also appointed
by Bill Clinton to the board of the mortgage
giant Freddie Mac in 2000 and his tenure
coincided with a stream of scandals and
financial irregularities. It famously had to
be bailed out by the taxpayer amid the
sub-prime mortgage debacle.
Emanuel, like Obama
himself, is an asset of the 'Illinois
Combine', a cross-party network of
politicians and business interests that
conspires to manipulate Chicago politics for
their own benefit. Even before taking over
at the White House Emanuel faced calls for
his resignation for alleged connections with
the Rod Blagojevich scandal.
In December 2008
Blagojevich, the Illinois governor and
associate of Obama, was arrested over a
conspiracy involving massive corruption and
moves to sell Obama's Senate seat in Chicago
made vacant by his election to the
presidency. It is yet another example of the
staggering web on ongoing and infamous
corruption in Chicago by the very networks
that spawned Obama.
A close friend of Rahm
Emanuel is another clone of the Illinois
Combine, the Zionist, David Axelrod, who ran
Obama's election campaign and will no doubt
be highly influential in the Obama
administration. Axelrod is a veteran of
Chicago politics, one of the most corrupt
political systems in the world and he worked
for many Chicago mayors in the 1990s and on
Obama's senate campaign in 2004.
Bill Clinton took his
Arkansas cabal to Washington when he became
president in 1993 and Obama is uploading his
Chicago mob and handing them key positions
of national power and influence. And these
guys don't take prisoners.
All of this may be many
things, none of them pleasant, but 'change'
Axelrod, Obama's 'narrator' and handler. Click
here for a background article that needs
some reading between the lines ...
Obama is a monumental
fraud who talks a good story, but lives a
very different one. He won his first
political office as a state senator in
Chicago in 1996, not through the power of
his policies, but by coldly abusing the
Instead of running against
his opponents and letting the people decide,
he had his cronies challenge hundreds of
names on the nomination papers of his
Democratic primary rivals until they were
all forced off the ballot by technicalities.
He then ran unopposed. One of them, Gha-is
Askia, says that Obama's behaviour belied
his image as a champion of the little guy
and crusader for voter rights:
'Why say you're for a
new tomorrow, then do old-style Chicago
politics to remove legitimate candidates? He
talks about honour and democracy, but what
honour is there in getting rid of every
other candidate so you can run scot-free?
Why not let the people decide?'
Why? Because he would
probably have lost and Obama isn't
interested in losing by playing fair. He
wants to win by any means necessary. The
only voter-right he's interested in is the
right to vote for him. He has also used his
hatchet-men like Axelrod to employ scandal
to discredit opponents to ensure his
election when the real scandal is the truth
about Obama himself.
He is a classically
corrupt main-chancer spawned from the
Chicago political cesspit. His close
connections, therefore, to seriously dodgy
'businessmen' and fraudsters like the
now-jailed slum landlord Tony Rezko are
exactly what you would expect.
Rezko, yet another snout
in the trough of the Illinois Combine, has
heavily funded Obama's political career and
that of the now-arrested Rod Blagojevich,
and in return they have supported massive
sums being paid to Rezko by Chicago
taxpayers to run 'public housing'.
These properties were then
allowed to fall into such a state of danger
and disrepair, including sewage running into
kitchen sinks, that they were deemed unfit
for habitation by the often black poor that
Obama was supposed to be representing as a
Senator. Some buildings were so bad they had
to be demolished.
Rezko also secured
appointments for his business associates to
state boards and was eventually indicted for
using these connections to demand kickbacks
from businesses that wanted to do business
with the state.
Rezko and Obama toured the
$1.6 million mansion in Hyde Park, Chicago,
which the Obamas bought at $300,000 below
the asking price in 2005 while the Rezkos
purchased the adjoining land at the full
asking price. Some of this land was later
bought by the Obamas. Rezko contributed a
quarter of a million dollars to Obama's
political career and served on Obama's
Senate campaign finance committee, which
raised more than $14 million.
Then there is Obama's
close association with the terrorists,
William Ayers and his wife Bernardine Dohrn.
In the late sixties Ayers co-founded the
terror organisation called the Weather
Underground (also known as the Weathermen
and similar derivatives) and launched a
campaign of bombing public places like the
Pentagon and the Capitol Building. Three
members were killed making bombs in
In 1970 Ayers was said to
have described their philosophy as: 'Kill
all the rich people. Break up their cars and
apartments. Bring the revolution home, kill
your parents, that's where it's really at
...' Mr. Ayers himself comes from the home
of 'rich people'.
Bernardine Dohrn said this
about the Charles Manson murders: 'Dig it!
Manson killed those pigs, then they ate
dinner in the same room with them, then they
shoved a fork into a victim's stomach.''
Ayers in 1968.
the day of 9/11 he told the New York Times
that he didn't regret the Weather
Underground bombing campaign and believed
they didn't do enough.
The case against Ayers and
Dohrn was thrown out because of then illegal
wire-taps and Ayers is now a
professor in the College of Education at the
University of Illinois at Chicago, holding
the titles of Distinguished Professor of
Education and Senior University Scholar.
Obama to serve as chairman on the $100
million Chicago Annenberg Challenge and they
worked together for seven years handing out
grants to the 'educational' projects of
people like ... William Ayers. They also
worked together on another tax-exempt
foundation, the Woods Fund in Chicago, which
awarded grants to Obama's own Trinity United
Church, home to his controversial pastor,
Obama's political career
was effectively launched in 1995, just after
he was made chairman of the Annenberg
Challenge, at a meeting at the Chicago home
of ... William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn.
They have been connected to his circle ever
since if the truth be told.
The Chicago Annenberg
Challenge, run by Obama and Ayers, didn't
fund schools directly, but instead insisted
that they affiliate with 'external partners'
who were granted the money. These turned out
to be far-left 'community organisers' so
beloved of Bill Ayers and these groups
included the Association of Community
Organizations for Reform Now (or Acorn).
Obama also conducted
'leadership training' seminars with Acorn
and its members began to become heavily
involved in his political campaigns. It has
also been behind efforts to 'register
voters' (voters most likely to vote for
Obama) and Nevada state officials raided
Acorn's Las Vegas office after election
authorities accused the group of submitting
multiple voter registrations with fake and
Among the major funders of
Acorn ... George Soros.
Obama even refuses to
prove that he was born in the United States
and thus qualifies to be President. He
claims to have been born in Hawaii, but his
grandmother, half-brother and half-sister in
Kenya all insist he was born there.
'Mr. Clean' Obama has a
deeply dirty background, but for now no
scale of evidence will stop the swooning
Obama zombies from believing the hype or
burst their reality bubble. That is going to
take hard experience and it could take some
time and a lot of disappointment before they
are released from the clutches of cognitive
dissonance and have to admit to themselves
they have been had.
It is the same for all the
black people who voted for what they thought
was the first black president when, in
truth, he is a man in a black mask
representing the interests of the
white-faced Illuminati cabal, the very
families and networks that ran the slave
I don't want to be the
bringer of bad news or the thwarter of
dreams, but honesty demands it. The man is a
trickster controlled by supertricksters. A
sock puppet controlled by bigger sock
puppets who serve an even greater and darker
evil. To his masters, Obama is just a means
to an end and if it suits them to
assassinate him to trigger civil war and
upheaval in the United States then that is
what they will do.
Oh dear Oprah, how will
you cope when reality dawns? But, then, will
You mean you're not the Lord?'
I can understand the
appeal of Obama because people want him to
be what he claims to be, but isn't. They are
sick of the conflict, the corruption, the
struggle we call 'life' and they want it all
to change. But Obama's change is illusory
and represents only the continued
transformation of society in the image
envisaged by Orwell.
We will see some
apparently good things announced, like the
closing of Guantanamo, to give the
impression that Obama means what he says.
But keep your eye on the ball and you'll see
how the agenda of the global tyranny is
introduced under the guise of Obama's
'hope', 'change', 'believe', 'sacrifice' and
It could take two years,
maybe much more, before cognitive dissonance
(lying to yourself) loses it current grip on
the minds of the Obama faithful. Until then
they will make endless excuses for him (lie
to themselves) to keep the 'dream' alive.
But one day they will have
to admit, by the power of the evidence
before them, that they bought a dream and
got a nightmare. What a pity they can't see
the obvious now and save them themselves
such painful disappointment.