|
I also recognized more attempts to divide Rasta as
it turned out the writer was well aware of the
fact that Selassie means "Trinity" and how there
are really many different views on Christ and
the Emperor within the Movement. This was
obviously an attempt to fight Rastafari. In a
rather dirty way, I might add.
Trying to put one Rasta against another for
something that is foundational for a Christian
but not necessarily for a Rasta, by someone who
admittedly does "not recommend Rastafari" and
obviously has an issue with the fact that I do
believe Yesus Kristos to be JAH: I needed to do
a little bit more research.
I found another website by the same people.
Interestingly enough, they presented themselves
as part of "The
antithesis of the current satanic system".
The "good cop" in a game-of-downpression known
as the Hegelian Dialectic.
Just like New Age "researchers" such as
Michael Tsarion and Jordan Maxwell present
themselves as opposers of Babylon System where
in reality they are teaching the very doctrines
of the ancient Mystery Schools, here we had
another participant in the game of thesis and
anti-thesis, the divide-and-rule tactique.
The Christ-deniers wanted me to choose
between their thesis and their anti-thesis, too.
They gave me a choice between:
the non-Roman Christianity of the
Rastafarians (...), or instead that
of their opponents, the followers of the
Constantinian Roman edict at Nicea (LINK)
Now obviously, with the Ethiopian Emperor
Haile Selassie being a "Trinitarian", for the
name Selassie means Trinity, the difference
between a Christian Rasta and one who follows
the Babylonian Church-and-State system called
Babylon, is not based on one's view on the
Trinity.
It was obvious, that this was a
trick-question and an attempt to put Rastafari
against Rastafari.
It was obvious an attack on the Divinity of
Yesus Kristos Himself, even!
I continued my research.
Next to audio files with titles like "Paul
the False Apostle" I could also
click on
long citations from the Islamic Koran.
I remembered seeing a comment on yet a third
website by the same people, that said how
Islam was supposed to be closer to "early
Christianity" than "modern day Trinitarian
Christianity".
These people obviously had a very, very big
problem with the fact that Yesus Kristos really
is JAH, and with the fact that I do proclaim my
belief in this Yesus Kristos Who is JAH.
Additionally, they have a big problem with
Rastafari too.
Even though they admittedly "do not recommend
Rastafari", they saw no problem in defining the
"Christianity of the Rastafarians", even though
there is no such thing as a "Christianity of the
Rastafarians".
It's an absurdity, of course. A line of
reasoning that is so obviously a teaching from
Satan's book of tricks that it needs no further
comment.
If you admittedly "do not recommend
Rastafari", than why not simply leave it alone?
The Movement of Rastafari is not based on no
writs and rites, but on a matter of the heart.
I do recommend Rastafari, and I also
recommend the Divine Saviour Yesus Kristos for
everyone.
And sure, there is plenty debate within the
Movement of Rastafari about the person of Yesus
Kristos, about the Ethiopian Emperor, and a lot
more.
But none of these things are to be used by
someone who has an issue with my Christianity
rather than my Rastafarian sympathies if you
will.
Give Thanks, One Love
Messian Dread |
